Jules

Vulpius

Gregersen

Marginalization

Sociology

Fall

2011

Marginalization Sociology Copenhagen School Fall 2011 By Professor Leopold Galicki Exam option B, crafted assignment Subject matter option: 3 – concepts of composition and agency Total number webpages: 12 Count signs: twenty-five. 560 Pupil Julie Vulpius Gregersen CPR: 280887-1958

Stand of items Introduction………………………………………………..... ………………………………………2 Concepts of marginalization sociology………………………………………………………………2 Outline from the debate…………………………………………………………………………………4 Two attempts for the better conception………………………………………………………………... 6 Relating structure and agency to the marginalization typology……………………………………... 8 Just how is marginalization a matter of subject and object?..................................................................... 15 Final terms and conclusion…………………………………………………………………………11 Literature……………………………………………………………………………………… …... 12

one particular

Julie

Vulpius

Gregersen

Marginalization

Sociology

Land

2011

Composition versus organization

Introduction A sociological congress in Tübingen in 1961 manifested a discussion unpleasant the social sciences for many years. It was a discussion between Ornamento and Popper, and later in, Albert and Habermas regarding philosophy of science and the way to conduct medical research. To its primary the issue was dichotominal: Are all of us as individuals capable of describing a target reality objectively or can be even the man of science merely a subject interpreting a socially constructed reality? 1 ) Parallel and related with this debate, the debates of micro-macro, subject-object and – structure-agency possess persisted. They contain inquiries of ontological, epistemological, methodological and even ideological character. When ever taking area in the argument one also takes aspect in concerns such as " how can be society produced? ”, " what is reality”, " how free is definitely Man? ” and " how can we reach ‘the truth'”? Through this paper I will try to format the two key poles inside the debate of structure and agency; structuralism and action sociology which usually respectively respect human life informed simply by systemic set ups and realistic action. Let me also elaborate on two advocates who have attempted to combine the two. I then will certainly discuss how these ideas of composition and firm influence and can be understood in relation to the marginalization phenomenon after which I will try to explain marginalization theory regarding the issue of subject matter and subject. Concepts of marginalization sociology According to Townsend, the definition of the marginalization phenomenon is following: ".. the processes that creates groups of individuals that in one method or another and varying extents are excluded from participation in the main currents of cultural life, to which they are focused despite their very own marginality. ”2 Juul Kristensen emphasizes 4 distinct features of this description:

• • •

Marginalization is a process The process is unwanted by the individual There exist both objective and subjective importance in participation in offered activities, from where the individual can be excluded/marginalized

•

Marginalization is different from total exclusion

1

Sociologisk

Leksikon,

side

504-­‐505

2

Julie

Vulpius

Gregersen

Marginalization

Sociology

Fall

2011

Marginalization is definitely therefore dependent on both the specific actor and society; framework. Furthermore, it is just a process and differs slowly but surely from exemption on a range. According to Galicki, marginalization is trans-historical in the form of moves-to and moves-from praxis we certainly have known because the beginning of times3. Because...